I don't know if the 315 would fit under the car or not. The problem I have is M/T rated tire size specs are out of whack. I've had both 295/65's and 325/50's on a 9.5" rim. They both have a measured section width of 13" on my rim. The 295 has 10.5" of tread where the 325 is right around 11 3/4". I don't remember measuring the 295's height, but the 325 measures are 27.5" or less...buggers are short!
M/T's rated specs are as follows:
325/50 28" tall, 13" section, 11" of tread
295/65 30" tall, 12.4" section, 10" tread
215/60 30" tall, 13.4" section, 11" of tread
I you notice, my 326 & 295 tire, neither matched the M/T rated specs in one dimension or another.
Now, I have a frame notch 1" deep...pretty conservative. My 295's sit well under the fender lip...I've seem Malibu's with the tires much further out...Phil's 28 x 12.50 ET Streets and Mitch's car as well as Pauls all come to mind. I can't get my finger in between the tire and frame...likely about 3/8" clearance, but has NEVER rubbed the frame. IF I spaced the rim out a tad AND IF M/T's 13.4" of section width were correct for the 315's, I'd bet I could get them to fit. Mind you they would be very tight, but they could fit. But I'm betting mounted up the 315 section width is wider than 13.4", plus given their size, I'd think they would work better on a 12" rim than a 10".